FIRST EVER CLOSED HEARING IN THE UK SUPREME COURT – BANK MELLAT’S CASE

Today the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has held a closed hearing for the first time in its history.  It has been hearing Bank Mellat’s appeal against the Court of Appeal’s judgment refusing to set aside the United Kingdom’s direction preventing people operating in the financial sector in the UK from doing business with the Bank (an Order in Council made under the Counter Terrorism Act 2008).

The Treasury had made that Order on the grounds that the Bank was alleged to provide banking services to a UN listed organisation connected to Iran’s proliferation sensitive activities, and had been involved in transactions related to financing Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programme.  The High Court and Court of Appeal rejected the Bank’s arguments that the Order was disproportionate, discriminatory, and procedurally unfair [2012] QB 101.

The General Court of the European Union quashed the Bank’s designation by the EU before the Supreme Court hearing, on the grounds that the reasons given for its designation were too vague and unsupported by evidence (Case T-496/10 – see blogs on Bank Mellat)

The Bank, supported by Liberty, opposed the Government’s application for the Supreme Court to consider the “closed” judgment of the High Court in which secret evidence was considered but not disclosed to the Bank (the statutory scheme permits CMPs in the High Court and Court of Appeal but is silent on the Supreme Court).  The Supreme Court gave a preliminary ruling, holding (by a majority of 6 to 3) that it had jurisdiction to consider the closed judgment and to hold a closed hearing if necessary.

Today it held a closed hearing for the first time in its history, Lord Neuberger describing it as an “unhappy procedure”.  The Bank was represented by a special advocate but the Bank itself could not see the material or attend the closed hearing.  The Court has not yet decided whether to give a closed as well as an open judgment.

This entry was posted in Court Procedure, Iran, Terrorist Sanctions, United Kingdom and tagged by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

4 thoughts on “FIRST EVER CLOSED HEARING IN THE UK SUPREME COURT – BANK MELLAT’S CASE

  1. Pingback: BANK MELLAT AND BANK SADERAT CASES FIGHT ON… | European Sanctions Blog

  2. Pingback: UK SUPREME COURT QUASHES ORDER AGAINST BANK MELLAT | European Sanctions Blog

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s