ORGANISATIONS CALL ON EUROPEAN COURT TO CONSULT ON CLASSIFIED EVIDENCE RULE CHANGE

We previously reported on this blog that the European Court of Justice is currently considering a proposal from the General Court (the first instance European court) to permit the use of classified evidence in actions for annulment.  And that Lord Pannick QC asked the British Government a question in Parliament about its position and whether it would ensure public consultation on this issue.

A number of prominent organisations in the UK have now written to the President of the European Court of Justice suggesting that the Court should consult on this proposed rule change.  The letter was signed by the Bar Councils of England and Wales, the General Council of the Bar of Ireland and Northern Ireland, the Scottish Faculty of Advocates, the Law Societies of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, Justice, Liberty, the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, and a number of Specialist Bar Associations.

The letter suggests that an amendment to the Court’s rules to permit exceptions to the principle that a person should know the case against him or her “may have a serious impact on the rule of law, natural justice and rights of defence, and may raise serious issues of constitutional and public importance for fundamental rights in the European Union, upon which our organisations (and others) may wish to comment”.

The President of the ECJ has replied saying that the Court has not reached any conclusion about “new provisions allowing the General Court, under certain conditions, to order that it receives and takes into account certain confidential information to which some parties to the proceedings will not have access”, that “if and when it does so, the Court will do so in accordance with the primary law provisions on the protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Union”, and that the procedure for amending the Court’s rules do not provide for a public consultation. In a second letter, the same organisations have explained further why consultation is appropriate in these particular circumstances and have asked the Court to reconsider.

This entry was posted in Court Procedure and tagged by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

2 thoughts on “ORGANISATIONS CALL ON EUROPEAN COURT TO CONSULT ON CLASSIFIED EVIDENCE RULE CHANGE

  1. Pingback: RECENT EUROPEAN COURT JUDGMENTS ON IRANIAN SANCTIONS | European Sanctions Blog

  2. Pingback: Kadi II: Der EuGH kämpft um Informationen und der Einzelne sieht zu

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s