The Commercial Court has granted summary judgment to Bank Melli, Persia International Bank and a German bank (DVB Bank SE) to recover over €40 million outstanding under a syndicated post-delivery ship finance facility from a number of Iranian ship owning companies, and to DVB against a number of Iranian guarantors including the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines in respect of the default under the loan facility.  The case follows a line of similar cases, including Melli Bank v Holbud Limited (see previous blog).

The Court held that the borrowers and guarantors had no prospect of succeeding in their argument that they did not have to repay the sums because the European Union sanctions against Iran frustrated performance of the contract, or made it illegal or impossible to perform because it would have constituted the provision of “economic resources” or the making available of “funds” by increasing equity in the vessel.  Mr Justice Simon stated that this was “not the effect of the Regulations nor is it consonant with their broad intent.”

He rejected the argument that payment under the contract constituted the provision of “economic resources” or would breach the asset freeze, since the agreement was not an asset but an instrument imposing liability to repay; the assets of designated persons were frozen but not the discharge of their liabilities.  Any payments received by the Iranian banks would be paid into frozen accounts with authorisation from the relevant national authority and the borrowers had not tried to obtain a licence. The Court also rejected the borrowers’ application to make a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice on the meaning and effect of the relevant EU Iran sanctions regulations.

The judgment, handed down on 31 July 3013, is here: Bank Melli and Persia International Bank -v- Shere Shipping and ors [2013] EWHC 2321 (Comm).

This entry was posted in English court cases, Iran and tagged by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s