35 COMPANIES SAID TO BE IRISL SUBSIDIARIES WIN THEIR EU ANNULMENT CASES

195px-european_court_of_justice_insignia-svgThe General Court of the EU has annulled the entries of 35 companies that were listed on the EU’s restrictive measures relating to Iran in 2010-2011 on the grounds that they were owned or controlled by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL).  A link to the judgment is here, in Joined Cases T-420/11 and T-56/12 Ocean Capital Administration GmbH & Ors v Council.

The General Court held that since the Council had not established that IRISL itself provides support for nuclear proliferation and the Court had therefore annulled its listing in 2013 (see previous blog on this), the Council could not maintain the listings of entities on the sole basis that they are owned or controlled by IRISL.  The Court said that since the IRISL judgment had not been appealed, that judgment had retroactively removed IRISL’s listing, and has effect ‘erga omnes’ and is ‘res judicata’.  IRISL has since then been re-listed, and has brought another legal challenge in Luxembourg – see previous blog.

We also reported previously here that the individuals said to be linked with IRISL had also won their annulment action.  The British Government has indicated in a statement to the House of Commons last week that the Council of the EU intends to re-list one of those successful applicants, along with another entity, on the basis of new reasons, but that it cannot disclose the evidence on which it relies “due to its confidentiality”.

Maya Lester acts for the Ocean Capital applicants and for IRISL.

This entry was posted in European Court Cases, Iran by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s