The background to this case is the same as the EU Kadi litigation (see previous blog). Chafiq Ayadi (a Tunisian national living in Ireland) was added to the UN Security Council’s Al Qaida sanctions list in 2001 (just after 9/11) at the same time as Mr Kadi (without any reasons). Like Mr Kadi, he brought an application to annul the EU implementation of that UN listing in 2002, which he lost before the Court of First Instance in 2006 (T‑253/02) then won on appeal to the ECJ (C-399/06 P and C-403/06 P). Both men then challenged their re-listing by the EU, which was based on the UN’s statement of reasons. Mr Kadi won Kadi II in the ECJ (see previous blog).  Mr Ayadi has just won Ayadi II in the General Court (link to judgment here), the case having been remitted to the General Court by the ECJ, which had decided in 2013 that he still had a right to continue the case even though he had been de-listed by the UN and EU in 2011 (see previous blog).

The General Court found all of Mr Ayadi’s arguments to be admissible, even though he had not expressly raised them before the ECJ remittal, because he had “adhered to the core substance” of his previous arguments.  Mr Ayadi won on the same grounds as Mr Kadi in Kadi II. The Commission had not discharged its duty to examine whether the reasons for his listing were well founded in light of his observations or to request disclosure of information that would have helped it discharge that duty, and, as in Kadi II, had only observed the rights of the defence “in the most formal and superficial sense”.  The Court held that although it was not legally bound by the factual findings about Mr Ayadi in Kadi II, it applied them by analogy in the absence of any other evidence, dismissed all other allegations against Mr Ayadi, and ordered the Commission to pay his costs (to refund the Court, since Mr Ayadi was legally aided).

This entry was posted in European Court Cases, Terrorist Sanctions by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s