ECJ DISMISSES APPEAL IN BELARUS IPATAU CASE

We reported in September that the EU General Court had dismissed an action for annulment brought by Mr Ipatau, one of the people listed in the EU’s restrictive measures against Belarus, in Case T-646/11 Ipatau v Council (see blog here). Mr Ipatau was listed for violating international electoral standards in his capacity as Deputy Chairperson of Belarus’ Central Electoral Commission (CEC).

The Court of Justice has now dismissed his appeal, in Case C-535/14 P Ipatau v Council. The Court said the General Court was right to hold that the grounds for Mr Ipatau’s listing were adequate because it had made factual findings that the CEC and Mr Ipatau were responsible for violating electoral standards in the 2010 elections, and had not relied on presumptions that that was so or only on links to other people, and the Council had taken into account the findings of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and compared them with the findings of other institutions such as the Council of Europe.

The Court also upheld the General Court’s findings on rights of the defence and proportionality. The Council had been entitled to make changes to the reasons for Mr Ipatau’s listing in 2012, without hearing him beforehand, because the basis for the new reasons was the same as the previous ones – the applicant’s position as Deputy Chairperson of the CEC.  It also noted that Mr Ipatau had already submitted observations to the Council during regular reviews of the sanctions against Belarus, and so knew that this process was available to him.

This entry was posted in Belarus, European Court Cases by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s