HM Treasury guidance to NGOs on terrorism & sanctions legislation

HM Treasury has published a note providing guidance to NGOs on operating within sanctions legislation. The guidance states that:

  1. 1. The purpose of terrorist asset freezing regimes is to prevent funds from being used or diverted for terrorist purposes. The purpose of other international sanctions regimes is “to influence the behaviour of the targets of the sanctions by increasing the cost of doing business, denying them access to resources needed for the unwelcome behaviour, and to send a broader political message condemning the target’s behaviour. In Syria, the aims of sanctions are to downgrade Assad’s ability to wage war on his people and pressure the regime into reassessing its position and reengaging in negotiations with the moderate opposition”.
  2. The purpose of the licenses from HM Treasury are to “mitigate the impact of an asset freeze on certain aspects of a designated person’s life, whilst still ensuring that funds cannot be diverted for terrorist purposes or to support activities such as human rights violations and nuclear proliferation”. HMT say that it would be “unusual” for licences to be granted to cover payments made overseas; they “usually cover payments within the UK, where terrorist financing risks can be more easily managed”.
  3. NGOs must consider whether their activities are prohibited if they interact with designated people. “For example, simply meeting with a designated person, or providing them with a meal or a drink is unlikely to fall within the prohibitions whereas paying funds to the designated person or repaying a debt on their behalf are among the prohibitions that would apply”. Legislation does not prevent NGOs from operating overseas, including in areas where terrorist groups operate, but that it is the responsibility of NGOs and other organisations to “take reasonable steps to reduce the risk of non-compliance”.
  4. The Government “acknowledges the negative impact” of bank account closures / restricted banking services on NGOs, but says that “neither the government nor regulators can compel banks or other financial institutions to offer an account to a particular customer. Decisions taken by bank are private and taken in accordance with their risk appetite and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements”. Individuals should “engage proactively with their bank at the earliest possible stage and provide information about their desired transactions, including how the ultimate use of the funds will be monitored. It may also be helpful for NGOs to demonstrate their existing due diligence processes”.
  5. The risk of prosecution for terrorist offences for involvement in humanitarian work is low.

The guidance also has sections on proscribed organisations under the Terrorism Act, ransom payments, and BIS export control licences.

This entry was posted in United Kingdom by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s