ECJ upholds annulment of Bank Mellat’s Iran listing

The ECJ has upheld the judgment of the General Court that Bank Mellat had been unlawfully included in the EU’s Iran sanctions, following Advocate General Sharpson’s opinion (see previous blog). A link to the ECJ judgment is here: Case C-176/13 P Bank Mellat [2016].

Since 2010, Bank Mellat had been listed by the EU for supporting Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programmes, providing banking services to UN and EU designated entities, and for being the parent of FEE (UN designated). The ECJ held (in summary) that:

  1. The General Court was right that the reasons for Bank Mellat’s inclusion were too vague. In particular, the EU had not said which banking services it was said to have provided to which UN / EU listed entities. The Court reiterated (para 81) the case law requiring “specific and concrete reasons”.
  2. There was no evidence that FEE was a wholly owned subsidiary of Mellat, or that its UN designation justified Bank Mellat’s EU designation.
  3. The ECJ could not question the General Court’s factual findings about Novin Energy, to which Bank Mellat supplied services, nor its conclusion that the bank’s relationship with Novin did not constitute support by Mellat for nuclear proliferation.
  4. The ECJ (at para 91) said that the court below was wrong to have said that the Council must demonstrate from its file that it assessed in advance the “relevant and validity” of the material concerning each entity, but that should not result in the judgment being overturned.

Meanwhile Bank Mellat’s damages action in the UK against the Government for unlawful inclusion in the UK’s proliferation sanctions (pre its EU listing) continues; see previous blog.

This entry was posted in European Court Cases, Iran by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s