UK de-proscribes ISYF

The UK has de-proscribed the International Sikh Youth Federation from the UK’s list of organisations proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000 (see previous blog).  The Home Secretary may proscribe organisations that are “concerned in terrorism”, and she has concluded that this test was not met in the case of the ISYF.

There was a debate in the House of Commons about the ISYF de-proscription on 15 March 2016 before the order was made, in which MPs raised a number of concerns about the process for proscription and de-proscription under the Terrorism Act.  For example, as the Independent Review of Terrorism Legislation, David Anderson QC, has repeatedly stated in his reports on the Terrorism Act, the Government has acknowledged that a number of organisations do not meet the statutory test for proscription, but the Government will not (as it previously agreed) de-proscribe those organisations of its own accord, and stopped undertaking annual reviews of the evidence underlying proscription decisions in 2014. The only option for an organisation wishing to challenge proscription is to apply to the Secretary of State for de-proscription (none has ever succeeded) and then to appeal to the Proscribed Organisations Appeals Committee (POAC).  The ISYF did so, and the Government agreed to de-proscribe them as soon as it was ordered to give reasons for its continued proscription.

The Government has updated its document setting out the details of the proscription criteria and list of groups or organisations proscribed, which is available here. Maya Lester QC acted for the ISYF in POAC.

This entry was posted in Terrorist Sanctions, United Kingdom by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s