Court upholds re-listings of son of former Ukraine President Yanukovych & Mr Klyuyev

The General Court of the EU has annulled the 2014 listings of Oleksandr Yanukovych and Andriy Klyuyev on the EU’s sanctions freezing the assets of people said to have misappropriated Ukrainian state funds, but upheld their 2015 listings as subsequently amended by the EU Council, so they remain subject to sanctions.  The judgments are here: Case T-340/14 Klyuyev v Council and Case T-348/14 Yanukovych v Council.

The Court annulled the original listings in 2014, which had stated that they were “subject to investigation in Ukraine…for the embezzlement of Ukrainian state funds”, for the same reason as all the Court’s previous Ukraine judgments (see eg previous blog here); the listings were only based on a letter from Ukraine’s prosecutor stating that investigations had been opened into a number former senior officials to establish the misappropriation of public funds, but saying nothing about what each individual was accused of.  The amended reasons in 2015 say they are “subject to criminal proceedings” by the Ukrainian authorities for the “misappropriation of public funds or assets”, and the letter they were based on contained sufficient detail for the Court now to say the listing criteria were fulfilled. The applicants raised a number of other grounds of challenge (legal basis, rights of defence, proportionality etc) that were also all rejected.

This entry was posted in European Court Cases, Russia, Ukraine by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s