General Court rejects Iranian bank’s annulment application

The General Court of the EU has dismissed an application by Tose’e Ta’avon Bank (TTB) to annul its listing on the EU’s anti-nuclear proliferation sanctions on Iran. Case T-435/14 Tose’e Ta’avon Bank v Council [2016].  The case relates to a listing before the JCPOA lifted the EU’s sanctions on Iran.

As the Court of Justice has ruled in the past (see previous blog), the Court rejected the argument that it was unlawful to base a listing on Article 291(2) TFEU, which gives the Council the power to implement sanctions unilaterally, and that TTB’s listing should have been based on Article 215(2) TFEU, which requires a joint proposal from the EU’s High Representative and the Commission.  The Court said the Council was entitled to conclude that TTB provides support to the Government of Iran because it is a state company that provided financial resources to the Government in amounts that were “quantitatively significant”. On the basis of previous case law, there was no need to show that the financial support was directly related to Iran’s nuclear programme.

The Court rejected the applicant’s argument that the Council had made an error of assessment, because the Court said an assessment of financial support must be based on circumstances at the time of listing, irrespective of whether it had previously or since received back the funds it had transferred to the government.  The Court rejected the arguments that the listing infringed the principle of proportionality or rights of defence.

This entry was posted in European Court Cases, Iran by Maya Lester QC. Bookmark the permalink.

About Maya Lester QC

Maya Lester QC has a wide ranging practice in public law, European law, competition law, international law, human rights & civil liberties. She has a particular expertise in sanctions. As the most recent (2016) Chambers & Partners directory put it, she "owns the world of sanctions". She spent 2011-12 in New York at Columbia Law School lecturing and writing on sanctions. She represents and advises hundreds of companies and individuals before the European and English courts and has acted in most of the leading cases, including Kadi, Tay Za, Central Bank of Iran, NITC and IRISL.

Please Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s