The EU has added two of Joseph Kony’s sons, both of whom hold senior positions in the Lord’s Resistance Army, to its sanctions against the Central African Republic. Ali Kony and Salim Kony were listed by the UN and US last month, following the listing of Joseph Kony and the LRA in March (see previous blog). See Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1442 implementing Regulation 224/2014 and Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/1446 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP.
The House of Commons European Scrutiny committee has published its conclusions on recent EU sanctions measures relating to Iran, Central African Republic, Burma/Myanmar, and Ukraine & Russia. It has not cleared them all…
Considering the EU’s decision in April 2016 to re-list Bank Saderat with new reasons on its Iran sanctions, after the bank had the annulment of its prior sanctions listing upheld by the Court of Justice (see previous blog), the Committee declined to clear the related measures from scrutiny. It said that Minister for Europe David Lidington had not provided an explanation as to why the Council considered that the new listing would be any more likely to withstand challenge than the previous one, adding that lack of any explanation in respect of the “barely discernible” changes gave rise to the inference that the new listing was an artificial legal device to prolong sanctions with a weak legal foundation.
Central African Republic
The Committee cleared the EU’s decision in April to make minor amendments to the derogations under its arms embargo on the CAR and update the designation criteria for its asset freeze and travel ban, primarily to reflect that elections had taken place in the country (see previous blog). However, the committee objected to its scrutiny having been overridden in this case, distinguishing it from the EU measures targeting Joseph Kony (see previous blog) that it cleared last month. It stated that the override of its scrutiny was “part and parcel of a policy adopted recently by the Minister”, by which he is “deliberately undermining scrutiny” by the House of Commons.
The EU’s decision to extend its sanctions against Burma for a further 12 months, until 30 April 2017 (see previous blog), was cleared of scrutiny by the Committee. It noted the ongoing challenge posed by the influence that the Burmese military retains in government, and concerns about Burma’s human rights situation, and asked the Minister to report back to it on an upcoming meeting of the EU-Myanmar Human Rights Dialogue.
Ukraine & Russia
The Committee has called for the Commons to debate the wider context of the EU’s economic and sectoral sanctions against Russia, which the Minister has said should be extended in July in view of the fact that the Minsk peace agreements have yet to be implemented in full. In the meantime, the Committee has kept under scrutiny the EU’s decision to extend its targeted sanctions against people undermining the sovereignty of Ukraine until 15 September 2016 (see previous blog).
The EU has added amended its CAR sanctions in 2 ways:
- It has amended the derogations to its arms embargo and added a new one, which allows for technical assistance, financing, or brokering services to be provided where they relate to the supply of non-lethal equipment and the provision of assistance (including training for the CAR security forces) intended solely to support the process of Security Sector Reform, in coordination with the UN’s peacekeeping operation and provided the UN Sanctions Committee has been notified in advance. The amendments expressly allow for the provision of training relating to the supply of non-lethal military equipment for strictly humanitarian or protective use. They also add a requirement to notify the UN Sanctions Committee in advance when taking advantage of the derogation allowing small arms and related equipment to be provided for international patrols providing security in the Sangha River Protected Area.
- It has amended the designation criteria for targeted asset freezes and travel bans to:
- shorten the fundamental designation criterion from “persons designated by the Committee as persons engaging in or providing support for acts that undermine the peace, stability, or security of the CAR” to “persons designated by the Committee” for being involved in one of several specific activities, which are “engaging in or providing support for acts that undermine the peace, stability, or security of the CAR” and the examples given previously under the former criterion; and
- change the specific examples of acts that undermine the peace, stability, or security of the CAR from “acts that threaten or violate transitional agreements, or that threaten or impede the political transition process, including a transition towards free and fair democratic elections, or that fuel violence” to “acts that undermine the peace, stability or security of the Central African Republic, including acts that threaten or impede the political transition process, or the stabilisation and reconciliation process or that fuel violence”.
The Commons EU Scrutiny Committee has cleared the EU’s implementation of UN sanctions against of Joseph Kony and the Lord’s Resistance Army from scrutiny (see previous blog). Summary here. UK Minister for Europe David Lidington explained the brutal tactics employed by Kony and the LRA involving “abductions, forced displacement, sexual violence and rape, killing and mutilation of thousands of civilians, as well as looting and destruction of property across central Africa”. The Minister said that:
“Multilateral sanctions play an important role in supporting the peace, security and stability of CAR. Through the designation of Joseph Kony and the LRA, the UN Security Council has sent a strong unified message condemning the incidents of violence and intimidation, holding to account and severely disrupting the actions of spoilers in their attempt to undermine this process.”
The Committee did not take issue with the Minister over-riding its scrutiny in this case, in order to expedite the transposition of the UN designations into EU law in view of the risk of asset flight.
The EU & Switzerland have joined the US in implementing the recent UN designations of Joseph Kony and his group the Lord’s Resistance Army (see previous blog). Under Kony’s leadership, the LRA is said to have been involved in the abduction and mutilation of thousands of civilians across central Africa, illicit trade in natural resources, sexual violence, murder, slavery, and the recruitment of child soldiers since the group was founded in 1987.
The EU designations are made by Implementing Regulation 2016/354 implementing Regulation 224/2014 and Implementing Decision 2016/360 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP and its notice to Kony and the LRA is here. Switzerland’s ordinance is here.
The US has designated the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and its leader Joseph Kony under its sanctions relating to the Central African Republic. Joseph Kony, who was already designated as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, and the LRA are designated for involvement in the abduction and mutilation of thousands of civilians across central Africa, illicit trade in natural resources, sexual violence, murder, slavery, and the recruitment of child soldiers since the group was founded in 1987. OFAC estimates that 21,000 Central Africans and 3,200 from the Democratic Republic of the Congo have been displaced as a result of LRA violence. In the press release, Acting Director of OFAC John Smith stated that the sanctions support the Treasury’s “broader effort to dismantle this militia group and seek a more stable and secure future” for the CAR.
The House of Commons EU Scrutiny Committee has cleared EU measures listing Haroun Gaye and Eugene Barret Nagikosset on EU sanctions against the Central African Republic (see previous blog) from scrutiny. The Committee said that Minister for Europe David Lidington had explained clearly and convincingly why the listings were appropriate, for undermining attempts to bring peace, reconciliation, and democracy to “this deeply traumatised country”. As is often the case, the Minister approved the measures before the Committee had a chance to scrutinise them; the Minister said this was because the “rapid transposition of UN sanctions designations into EU legislation is highly desirable…and ensures the effectiveness and credibility of the sanctions regime”. A summary of the Committee’s views is here.