UK withdraws Iran export guidance following JCPOA

In light of the substantial lifting of EU sanctions on Iran under the JCPOA nuclear deal signed in 2015, the UK’s Export Control Organisation (ECO) has withdrawn its Iran List.  The list provided information about certain entities, companies, and organisations in Iran for exporters concerned about the possible end-use of their goods.  In future, exporters may use the end user advice service, which can be accessed via the SPIRE export licensing system.

The ECO’s notice is here.

EU court rejects Bank Tejarat’s challenge to its re-listing

The General Court of the EU has dismissed another challenge to an EU decision to re-list an Iranian entity that won its challenge to its original sanctions designation.  A link to the judgment is here. The Court regularly now upholds decisions to re-list entities on the revised basis that they provide support for the Government of Iran, in circumstances in which the EU could not sustain the original reasons given for their inclusion (usually on the grounds that they support Iran’s nuclear programme).

Bank Tejarat’s original listing was annulled in January 2015 (see previous blog) then it was re-listed in April 2015 (blog here). The General Court has said its re-listing was not unlawful essentially because it was based (inter alia) on the fact that it supports the Iranian Government by offering financial resources and services for oil and gas development projects which is a significant source of Government funding.

ZTE agrees $1.2bn fine for US sanctions violations

ZTE (Zhongxing Telecommunications Equipment Corporation and ZTE Kangxun Telecommunications Ltd), a Chinese telecoms company, has agreed with OFAC, BIS and the DOJ in the USA to plead guilty to civil and criminal charges of violating US sanctions on Iran and North Korea, and pay a combined $1.2bn in fines ($300m of which is suspended).  It also agreed to a 7-year suspended denial of export privileges, and to dismiss 4 senior officials who were involved in the violations.

A 5-year-long investigation found that ZTE had conspired to evade US sanctions by incorporating US components into its equipment and illegally shipping it to Iran, and by making 283 shipments of telecoms equipment to North Korea.  ZTE is also said to have used “isolation companies” to conceal the use of controlled US-components, intentionally failed to mention them on customs declarations, employed people to specifically remove incriminating evidence from internal communications, and caused its lawyers to unintentionally lie to US officials.

ZTE was first penalised by US authorities in March 2016, when US companies were prohibited from selling to it without a specific licence, and non-US companies were prohibited from selling products to it which contained a significant percentage of US-made components (see previous blog).  The US Department of Commerce will recommend that the requirement for a licence to do business with ZTE be lifted if ZTE complies with the terms of its settlement agreement.

US prosecutors may pursue Deutsche Boerse sanctions case

deutsche-boerse-1Prosecutors in the US are reported to be moving forwards with their investigation into alleged sanctions violations committed by Deutsche Boerse AG and its Luxembourg-based subsidiary Clearstream Banking SA.  Clearstream is alleged to have acted as an intermediary between Iran’s Central Bank and JPMorgan by receiving interest payments and redemptions into its JPMorgan account on $1.67bn of bonds held on behalf of an Italian bank that was acting as a front for Iran’s Central Bank.  There is no indication that JPMorgan knew the accounts were linked to Iran.

The prosecutors are said to be considering whether to charge Clearstream with violating US sanctions and making false statements to US regulators.  If they find that Clearstream’s management knowingly withheld information, they may bring charges against individuals.

General Court rejects another re-listing case; IRISL v Council

The General Court of the EU has rejected another challenge to the re-listing of entities after they have won their annulments challenging their initial listing on the EU’s Iran sanctions; Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v Council (link to the judgment is here).  The Court has held that the Council was entitled not only to re-list IRISL and some companies said to be connected with it, but that it could introduce new listing criteria that expressly target IRISL-connected companies after IRISL’s designation had been annulled (on which see previous blog). The judgment contains interesting comments on the probative value of witness evidence and the credibility and source of evidence. Maya Lester QC acted for the applicants.

Amazon reports US Iran sanctions breaches

amazon-logo-1Amazon has announced that it may have violated US sanctions on Iran by processing and delivering orders of consumer products to sanctioned people and entities located outside Iran.  Amazon voluntarily reported the possible violations, and has said that it will cooperate with an investigation by US regulators.  It has also said it will enhance its processes designated to identify transactions associated with people designated under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act 2012.

OFAC issues Finding of Violation to B Whale Corporation

oil-tanker-1OFAC has issued a Finding of Violation to B Whale Corporation (BWC), a shipping company based in Taiwan and member of the TMT Group of Shipping Companies, for violating US sanctions on Iran.  The violation occurred when BWC’s vessel, the M/V B Whale, transferred 2,086,486 barrels of crude oil from a vessel owned by the National Iranian Tanker Company, which is identified on OFAC’s SDN List.  OFAC’s enforcement notice is here.

The transaction took place while BWC was involved in bankruptcy proceedings in the US.  OFAC determined that BWC was a US person within the scope of its sanctions on Iran because it was present in the US for those proceedings when the transaction occurred.  In addition, the vessel B Whale was subject to US sanctions because it was property under the jurisdiction of a US court, and therefore the transfer of oil constituted an import from Iran to the US.

OFAC’s found BWC’s conduct to have been aggravated by its reckless disregard for US sanctions, attempts to conceal the transfer, and the significant benefit provided by the transaction to Iran, but mitigated by its clean sanctions record and the fact that all of its assets had been liquidated in bankruptcy.

New US targeted Iran sanctions

thum-0e213ce3a7c1af8c9007-1523The US Treasury department today added 13 people and 12 companies to its sanctions list, freezing their assets under US control. The White House spokesman, said the sanctions were a “very, very strong stand against the actions Iran has taken”; Iran tested a ballistic missile a few days ago. The new listings are here.  Among those sanctioned are those the US Treasury says support a trade network run by Iranian businessman Abdollah Asgharzadeh who is said to support Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group, a subsidiary of an Iranian entity said to run Iran’s ballistic missile programme, and a Lebanon-based network run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard.

A few hours before they were announced, President Trump tweeted: “Iran is playing with fire. They don’t appreciate how ‘kind’ President Obama was to them. Not me!” Iran’s foreign ministry, in a statement on Friday, said the US sanctions were “illegal” and “illegitimate” and said Iran would consider imposing restrictions on American entities and individuals who “have created and helped terrorist groups . . . and killings and suppression of defenseless civilians” in the Middle East.